|Home | About | Tags & Categories | Archive | Links | Twitter | Flickr | YouTube|
Posted on July 7, 2013 by Ash
I have been very lax for a while now in keeping Treeblog updated with the development of the Treeblog trees. I intend to make amends in the coming weeks by posting updates on all the grey alders, Scots pines, downy birches, rowans and beeches in the Treeblog stable – starting now with the Set A grey alders, which last appeared on these pages over fifteen months ago in this update from March 2012. But before I go into an standard update, please take a couple of moments to watch Treeblog’s first ever video which provides a brief overview of the life of my grey alders so far!
This is grey alder No. 1 on the 9th of June 2013 (Set A Day 2265), the same day as we filmed the video. The tree is alive and well; the sheep haven’t been back to finish it off.
This is grey alder No. 1 a few months earlier on the 19th of October 2012 (Set A Day 2032), back when I made a pre-winter tour of the alders with my father.
This is No. 1 on the 9th of June again, taken from a similar angle.
When I visited in October I noticed that alder No. 1 had a cluster of maturing female catkins…
…as well as a couple of clusters of immature male catkins, ready to open up and release pollen in spring.
I also visited the alders on the 30th of December 2012, minus my camera. My notes from that day record No. 1 having some mature female catkins and a few male catkins, No. 3 having many male catkins but no female catkins, and No. 2 having no catkins at all.
On my June visit, No. 1 again had two or three clusters of immature female catkins. I didn’t see any sign of last year’s catkins.
This is grey alder No. 2 in October with yours truly for scale...
…and here’s No. 2 again on the 9th of June. It is still the best of the three grey alders in my opinion.
No. 2 had no catkins at all last year, but on my June visit I counted at least six clusters of immature female catkins (but no male catkins).
Here’s grey alder No. 3 in October…
…and here it is again in June.
In October, No. 3 had at least six clusters of male catkins but I didn’t notice any catkins at all on my June visit.
Now for some tree stats. I made measurements of height, stem circumference at base, and stem circumference at breast height (approx. 1.5 m) on my October and June visits, but made no measurements in December. Previously I estimated height by hanging a tape measure off a stick held up to the height of the trees, but (as seen in the video!) in June I took my bespoke measuring stick, fashioned by my father in 2008 and originally used during my dissertation fieldwork! Heights are approximate to the nearest 0.1 m and circumferences are approximate to the nearest centimetre.
* This only goes to show the potential errors hidden in these measurements!
And here is the base of alder No. 1. It has a much more slender stem than Nos. 2 and 3 and still shows severe wounding caused by grazing sheep. The tree seems to be struggling to compartmentalise this damage by growing ‘wound’ wood.
In stark contrast, the base of alder No. 2 is in pristine condition!
The base of No. 3 still shows sign of sheep damage but the wounds are rapidly being covered over with new wood and should hopefully be undetectable in a few years.
|© A. Peace 2006 - 2016|