Sycamore in Britain: native or non-native?

Sunny young sycamore leaves from a walk up Blackford Hill, Edinburgh, on the 3rd of May 2007.

Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) is a large deciduous tree common throughout the British Isles. It may be known in Scotland as the plane. Foreign readers of this blog should not confuse the British sycamore, with which I am concerned, with different species growing around the world which are also commonly called sycamore or plane.

The popular view is that sycamore is not a native of Britain. However, I recently read an article from a 1987 issue of the Quarterly Journal of Forestry by Esmond Harris 1, who puts forward a case for sycamore being a British native.

Harris begins with a little digression. The English used to call sycamore “the great maple” or the “mock plane tree”, and in fact the taxonomic name means maple (Acer) masquerading (pseudo) as a plane (platanus), as sycamore leaves are similar to those of planes such as the London plane (Platanus x hispanica) and the Oriental plane (Platanus orientalis). Harris writes that the modern common name “seems to have come from monks returning to Europe who saw its similarity to “sycomorus” of the Bible which is the sycamore fig (Figus sycomorus) of the Middle East”.

Back on the topic of sycamore’s provenance, Harris states the popular view is the tree was introduced to Britain by the Romans, but disputes this by arguing that there is no evidence for this “and anyway, why should they introduce a tree for which they would have no apparent use?” The Romans are known to have introduced useful trees, such as the sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa), which was grown for its nuts.

Harris dismisses the theory that sycamore was introduced from France in the Middle Ages on the grounds that, even though many writers have referred to this, none provided any evidence. Sycamore’s natural distribution in France does not reach the English Channel, a fact, Harris writes, used to support the non-native theory. Further support for this theory comes from the lack of sycamore pollen in ancient deposits, although Harris argues that sycamore pollen being gelatinous, it “could not be expected to preserve well” compared with “the hard pollen grain of most trees and shrubs”.

“However, with no positive evidence for introduction” Harris writes, “my own view is that sycamore may well be a native because it grows so well all over Britain, even in the most inhospitable places, and regenerates so freely.” I think this is a rather shaky foundation on which to base a theory of British nativity, for there are known introduced species that grow well and regenerate freely all over Britain (e.g. Rhododendron ponticum) while there are also known British natives that are confined to certain localities or habitats (e.g. wild service tree, Sorbus torminalis).

Harris provides examples of references to sycamore from the Middle Ages: a fourteenth century carving of a sycamore leaf in St. Frideswide’s shrine in Christchurch, Oxford; a written record in Turner’s Herbal in 1551; and a mention by Chaucer in Canterbury Tales, written about 1380, who was once a forester. But if sycamore was introduced by the Romans or during the Middle Ages, then why shouldn’t it appear in carvings or books from this time?

The next piece of evidence Harris uses to try to support his theory is also rather flimsy. “Unfortunately the wood of sycamore is so like maple that it cannot easily be distinguished in old wooden artefacts, furniture and musical instruments, where it is usually referred to as maple anyway. However the native field maple [Acer campestre] is too small to have been a significant timber tree.” Actually field maple can reach a height of 25 m (~80 ft) and a girth (circumference) of 3 m (~10 ft) at breast height 2. According to Wikipedia, Rushforth’s Trees of Britain and Europe 3 describes field maple wood as hard and strong and used for furniture and flooring.

Harris’ case for sycamore being native to Britain ends with a whimper. “The question needs to be asked, “what is the positive evidence that sycamore is an exotic in Britain?” After all, it is the only supposed non-native for which there is no evidence of introduction. We know how all the other introduced trees came here.” Not knowing how sycamore was introduced is no argument for saying that it wasn’t introduced! The rest of the article is rather interesting and goes on to describe the growth of sycamore in Britain, and its usefulness in terms of timber, amenity, shelter, and biodiversity.

Harris didn’t manage to convince me that sycamore is a British native. I’m sticking with the popular view that it is an introduced species, albeit a fully naturalised one nowadays. From the Royal Forestry Society of England, Wales and Northern Ireland’s site:

[Sycamore] is not native to Britain. Its real home is high ground in southern and central Europe extending northwards to Paris and east to the Caucasus.

When and who first introduced sycamore to Britain is uncertain. It may have been the Romans but it was still scarce here in the 16th century and has only really become established over the last 200 years.

As an epilogue to Harris’s article, there was a response by M. P. Denne 4 (of the Department of Forestry and Wood Science, University College of North Wales) published in the next but one issue of the Quarterly Journal of Forestry. Denne writes that she has “not yet found any sycamore amongst the fragments of charcoal that I have been asked to identify from a number of Neolithic sites in North Wales”. The second half of her letter is a good response to Harris, so I’ll give Denne the last say in this matter.

Judging from the uses they seem to have made of the different timbers on these sites, Neolithic people must have had considerable knowledge of the wood properties of different tree species. Since sycamore can produce good quality timber on a wide variety of sites, and the wood is strong and easy to work, one would have expected it to have been in frequent use if it had been widely available at the time. As Esmond Harris points out, sycamore regenerates freely and grows well all over Britain, even on inhospitable sites. So if it was native to Britain, is there any reason why it might have been relatively rare in Neolithic times?

1 Harris, E. (1987) The Case for Sycamore. Quarterly Journal of Forestry, 81 (1), 32-36.
3 Mitchell, A. (1978). Trees of Britain & Northern Europe. Collins Field Guide, HarperCollinsPublishers.
4 Rushforth, K. (1999). Trees of Britain and Europe. Collins.
5 Denne, M. P. (1987). Is Sycamore Native to Britain? (Correspondence). Quarterly Journal of Forestry, 81 (2), 201.

Posted in Miscellany

6 comments for Sycamore in Britain: native or non-native?


January 17, 2009 - 18:42 GMT

I must be honest working with trees for over 30 years you get a good feel for the biodiversity a tree supports. Naturally our native trees stand out in this field but I must say with them is the Sycamore!!


February 22, 2011 - 11:48 GMT

Yes, I have noticed that Sycamores support a decent amount of wildlife too.
The whole argument that it is "poor for biodiversity" is a load of rubbish since naturally some trees are better than others anyway NATIVE OR NOT.
There are many species of tree in the British Isles which are indeed native but very poor for biodiversity and in many cases introduced trees are actually BETTER for biodiversity than these natives.
However I do not advocate that we go planting loads of non-native trees though since that would be silly.
Sycamore if native to Britain fits in well here and grows readily in my opinion (I often see many of them sprouting up like weeds around here) and we'd have a lot more woodlands if all our trees grew as easily as Sycamore!
If its not native and instead naturalized then it isn't totally alien here anyway, its native to some areas of NW Europe - these areas aren't incredibly different in species and biodiversity to Britain anyway!
I see little evidence for it being introduced and I find it hard to believe that it wouldn't be native to Britain when its native to similar areas of the continent. Its absence along the English Channel could be explained by deforestation.

Kalle B.

February 25, 2011 - 11:43 GMT

Thank you Andrew to lead me to this old but very interesting post, I havn't seen it before.
I once read an article about sycamore written by a norwegian botanist. This tree is also a fast spreading non-native in Norway, it produces growable seed even north of the polar circle there. It's actually better suited for the extreme coast climate than the native acer platanoides. What was most interesting in that article was the conclusion that sycamore could have been a native today if it wasn't introduced by mankind. It's spreading so fast by it self, that it could have earned it's citizenship by now, but when it was introduced it will never be able to do it legally now.
There is some space in the biodiversity where the elms once was, why not let the sycamore in there?


September 7, 2011 - 08:55 GMT

Very interesting post - I wonder whether the Sycamore has been on a march northwards for a long time and the native range is perhaps a dubious 'fact'? Kalle B's comments are close to my own thoughts on the species - surely now is the time to embrace Acer pseudoplatanus? I recently wrote a less scientific post on the same subject that may be interesting to some:


April 2, 2012 - 02:20 GMT

In light of permanent, scorching, repeating glaciations, erasing anything taller than grass, cowberry and may be some shrubby willows at best, it is utterly senseless to talk about native and non-native plants anywhere in europe. There aren't any native trees in britain (and most of europe for that matter), unless you call cowberry 'a tree'.


April 3, 2012 - 18:03 GMT

I'm afraid you're missing the point - the line must be drawn somewhere. 'Native' when used in the context of British trees tends to describe species that have recolonised Britain since the last glaciation ended and before the land bridge to Europe closed, unaided by humans. That is how the distinguished experts Owen Johnson, Alan Mitchell & Oliver Rackham would recognise our native species. It is a widely understood definition.
Of course, there are still the 'are they / aren't they' species such as beech and sycamore, and there is the point raised by Kalle & Paulitzer in their comments. And then there are our endemic whitebeams - true natives by any definition of the word.

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated





Recent comments

I visited this tree in about 1978 and picked up a tiny fragment of the dead wood which I fashioned into a small neck pendant - still have it for luck (and longevity)! The tree was well and truly dead but a lot of wood still in existence then - I should have made a table! I went back in the...

702.958333333 days ago by Lee Le Clercq

Was the shot out of the tree not the 17th hole at the Rosendaelsche Golfclub near Arnhem, The Netherlands??????? Thank you in advance for your reaction. Kind Regards, Marlof Strumphler Krullenlaan 20 2061 HV Bloemendaal The Netherlands

719.958333333 days ago by Marlof Strumphler

Good work in planting and watching these trees grow. I haven't planted any but I have a number of trees I return to for measurement. I have a few young trees I am adding to my list.

811 days ago by Scott

treeblog's items Go to treeblog's photostream

Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/local/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20100525/' - /usr/local/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20100525/ cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0